The Listings Themselves
Hotels, restaurants or attractions for a city or a category, each with its bubble rating, review count, ranking string, address and price band.
A TripAdvisor page publishes more than a star average. AllyHub returns the parts that average hides, with the date the rank was read.
A property page carries a rank, a rating out of five, a set of category scores, and a review list you can cut six ways — and most exports return the first two. AllyHub works down the page instead: the listings, the reviews under them, the score broken apart, the slice you asked for, across every property you name.
Hotels, restaurants or attractions for a city or a category, each with its bubble rating, review count, ranking string, address and price band.
A review arrives as one row beneath its property: what the guest wrote, the bubbles they gave it, and the trip it is actually describing.
Where a property has them, the category scores TripAdvisor publishes come back as their own columns — Location, Cleanliness, Service, Value, Rooms, Sleep Quality — alongside how each traveler type scored it.
Name the slice at the start and the rest is never fetched: a star tier, one traveler type, the months people actually visited, a language, or a word you need to find.
Run your competitive set, a whole category in a city, or a group’s own portfolio together; the property name travels with every row.
Take it as CSV, JSON or Excel, or keep the run open and ask which complaints repeat, or how two properties differ once you hold traveler type constant.
Name the place or paste the links, say which reviews, and get TripAdvisor back as rows.
A city and a category, a property URL, or a list of competitors. Then say which reviews you want and how far back to go.
For each place: name, rating, review count, ranking string, address, price band. For each review: text, bubbles, trip month, post date, language, traveler type, subratings, and any management reply.
Take the file, or keep asking questions of the same pull. Save the property set as a Playbook and next quarter’s benchmark starts already built.
Most TripAdvisor exports hand back an average and a count. The page they came from said considerably more than that.
The ranking is a popularity position built from the quality, recency and quantity of reviews, on weights TripAdvisor does not publish. Fourth becoming seventh can mean a rival got busy rather than you got worse, so every rank arrives with its category, its total, and its date.
.jpeg&w=1920&q=75)
A single number out of five averages people who wanted different things. Where a property has them, TripAdvisor already separates the parts — Cleanliness from Value, families from business travelers — and every export folds them back into one figure. Keep the columns and a complaint has an address.
.jpeg&w=1920&q=75)
TripAdvisor records when someone traveled and when they posted, and the gap runs to months. A review from March can describe a stay from last August, before the refurbishment you are trying to see the effect of. Both dates come back, so you can read by either.
.jpeg&w=1920&q=75)
Between quarters the category itself moves: properties open, ranks reshuffle, review counts jump. Pin your named set and your filters into a Playbook and the comparison holds; and because your AllyHub never starts from scratch again, the re-run is the easy half.
.jpeg&w=1920&q=75)
Hotel and property operators, restaurant groups, hospitality researchers, and consultants who have to explain a position rather than just report one.
You have dropped three places and the ownership meeting is on Thursday. The average barely moved, so the answer is not in the average. Bring the rank with its date, and the category scores next to the properties you compete with, and you arrive with a reason instead of a screenshot.
The group looks healthy because a bubble average is cumulative, and one site’s last six months can be poor for a long while before the headline number admits it. Read the recent slice on its own, per location, and the site that is sliding stops hiding inside its own history.
A destination study needs two hundred properties recorded the same way, and copying ratings and rankings by hand introduces exactly the errors a peer reviewer will find. Take them in one pass, with the category and the read date on every row, and the dataset is one you can hand to somebody else.
The client asks why the place up the road is beating them, and “better reviews” is not a finding. Put the two sets of category scores side by side, split by who was traveling, and the gap turns out to be Value among families or Service among couples — something they can act on.
Explore more AI-powered tools across research, content, and data.

Scrape Google Maps reviews from any business at scale. AllyHub extracts ratings and review text for reputation research and competitive analysis. Try free.

Scrape Google Maps business listings, reviews, and contacts at scale. AllyHub structures local data for lead generation and competitive research. Try free.

Scrape Amazon product reviews at scale. AllyHub extracts ratings and review text from any ASIN for competitive research and sentiment analysis. Try free.
Guides on hospitality reputation management, review analysis, and competitive benchmarking in travel.

Learn how to scrape Amazon reviews using 3 practical methods — from no-code tools to AI automation. Extract review data for sentiment analysis, competitor research, and product strategy.

Discover the 7 best Amazon review analyzers for digital and e-commerce marketers. Compare free and paid tools, AI-powered options, and Chrome extensions.

Discover the 10 best Amazon competitor analysis tools used to track competitors, uncover keyword gaps, and understand why top listings outperform yours.
What people ask before benchmarking on TripAdvisor: what comes back, what the numbers actually mean, and where one run stops.
It turns TripAdvisor pages into records — the properties in a place with their ratings and rank, and the reviews sitting under them — so you can sort and compare instead of clicking through. AllyHub takes the request in plain sentences, covers a competitive set or a whole category in one run, and keeps the category scores and trip dates a plain copy-out drops.
Yes. One property with the standard listing and review fields runs on the free plan. Larger jobs sit on the paid plans: a whole category or a competitive set, deeper review pulls, filtering at collection, scheduled quarterly re-runs, and the analysis pass over the same data.
Yes, and deciding before the run beats sorting afterwards. Narrow by star tier, by traveler type, by the months people visited, by language, or by a keyword, and only the matching reviews are collected. Reviewer display names come back as TripAdvisor publishes them, so treat the file as personal data and store only what the work actually requires.
Smaller restaurants and attractions publish less than a large hotel does: no category scores, few or no traveler-type splits, sometimes no price band. Those fields come back empty rather than guessed, so you can see where the data thins out instead of reading a gap as a zero.
It is a position in TripAdvisor’s popularity ranking for that city and category, not a verdict on quality. It reflects how good, how recent and how many the reviews are, and it moves when other properties gain reviews. Read beside the rating and the review count it makes sense; read on its own it is a headline.
Yes, and that is the usual job. Give it a category and a city, or name the properties you’re watching, and it runs them all in one pass with the property name on every row. Save the set and the filters as a Playbook and the quarterly benchmark re-runs itself.